Peer Review Process

Article Acceptance and Review Process
All articles that are electronically registered in the "Journal of Research in Sports Nutrition" system are initially reviewed by the editor of the journal and, if they meet the necessary criteria for further specialized reviews, they are also entered into the review process by the Hamyab similarity search system, as in Joby. These articles will be evaluated without the names of the authors by at least 2 reviewers selected by the editor and the editorial board. If the article is rejected by only one reviewer or if both reviewers request major revisions, the article will also be sent to a third reviewer, and the responsible author will be notified of the acceptance, rejection, or need for revisions requested by the reviewers as soon as possible. If the article fully complies with the items mentioned in this guide and receives full acceptance from the reviewers, it will be put on the printing list.

Reasons for rapid rejection of articles
Articles will not enter the review process if they have any of the following, with the approval of the editor:
They do not match the objectives and focus of the journal.
They are not innovative
They have fundamental weaknesses in terms of structure or content
They have been previously published in this journal or other journals with a different structure.

 

The process of the framework for evaluating articles